Juror 10 says, "Bright, He's a common, ignorant slob. He don't even speak good English." (37) This is ironic because Juror 10 isn't speaking properly. the use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say especially in order to insult someone, to show irritation, or to be funny.Likewise, who is Juror 10 referring to when he says them?
Juror 10 indicates that all people like the boy on trial are liars based on experiences he seems to have had with them. In Act I he says, 'You're not going to tell us that we're supposed to believe him, knowing what he is. I've lived among 'em all my life. You can't believe a word they say.
Subsequently, question is, did three finally believe the boy was not guilty or did he vote just to get it over with support your answer? Support your answer. He voted because he believed he was not guilty. Four told him,"let him live," and Eight said,"He is not your boy.
Similarly, why does Juror #11 get so angry at Juror #7 for changing his vote the way he does?
Near the end of the play, Juror 7 announces that he's changing his vote to guilty, not because he believes the defendant might not be guilty, but because he has had enough and wants to go home. You have sat here and voted guilty with everyone else because there are some theater tickets burning a hole in your pocket.
Why did Juror 4 change his vote?
He is willing to listen and try to understand the others' points of views and gives their arguments credit where it is due, especially after analyzing the evidence, which had seemed to overwhelmingly prove the boy's guilt at first-Juror #4 changed his vote based on the realization that there indeed was reasonable doubt
Why do the other jurors turn their back on Juror 10?
Why do the other jurors turn their backs on 10's statements about his true feelings? Because he was continuously ranting about how terrible certain groups are and saying terrible assuming things about people in the slums, and everyone was getting sick of his bigotry--it's offensive and was uncalled for.Why is Juror 3 angry?
In 12 Angry Men, Juror 3 is the most challenging juror because of his unwillingness to work well with the other jurors. Juror 3 tries to bully the other jurors into voting guilty. Juror 3 does not work well with others. He is a bully, and he often tries to belittle other people.What does Juror 10 reveal about himself?
What does Juror #10 reveal about himself when he says "I lived among 'em all my life." He shows how he is racist, bias and prejudice and that is mainly fueling his verdict.Which three jurors are the most stubborn?
Answer: Jurors 10, 3, and 12 in my opinion the most stubborn because 10 is a bigot, 3 is very opinionated and 12 is a hurried business man who sees everything in black and white.Why is Juror 8 a hero?
Juror 8 is a hero because of his revolt against the status quo. The 8th juror is the first to vote not guilty because of his reasonable doubt and he had the confidence to stand up for his beliefs. He is the first juror to vote completely opposite from everyone else.Why does Juror 5 react the way he does when Juror 10 talks about the accused?
why does juror 5 react the way he does when your 10 talks about the accused? he reacted that way because he also grew up the same way as him in the slums.Why does Juror 8 call a secret ballot?
The vote by secret ballot that Eight proposes symbolizes an ideal principle of justice that is unbiased. The initial vote by hand, and the following discussion among the jurors, shows that many are swayed by the opinions of others, by the pressures of conformity, and by other concerns.Why does eight say he voted not guilty?
Juror 8. In the first vote, Juror 8 is the only one to vote not guilty. He does this not because he really feels that the defendant is necessarily innocent, but for another reason altogether. He votes not guilty because he feels that the group should discuss a case with such serious consequences before deciding.What did juror four do that keeps the group from being a hung jury?
What did Juror Four do that keeps the group from being a hung jury? He doesn't want to get off track so he sticks to his opinion. He tells them not to act like children and wants to keep talking about the case.What causes the conflict between jurors three and five at the opening of this scene?
What causes the conflict between jurors three and five at the opening of this scene? Juror three thinks the defendant is guilty, and juror five changes their verdict. Juror nine changes his vote because he doesn't want juror five standing alone.What is the major theme of this play 12 Angry Men?
The three main themes in Twelve Angry Men are justice, innocence, and class. These themes are interwoven, playing off of each other as the jury deliberates. In their hands, justice seems fragile, subject to the whims of men who just want to go home.Who changed their vote in Twelve Angry Men?
It is Juror Nine, the elderly man on the jury, who changes his vote from guilty to not guilty at the end of Act One, and he is the first juror to do so. Juror Nine changes his vote to support Juror Eight, who wants to discuss the evidence before reaching a verdict.Why does #11 Question #7 so closely about his willingness to change his vote?
why does juror 11 question juror 7 so closely about his willingness to change his vote? Juror 3 voted guilty because he wanted to get it over with. He also didn't have enough courage to stand alone, nor was able to give facts to back up his reasoning for saying the boy was guilty.What proposition does eight make to his fellow jurors?
What proposition does EIGHT make his fellow jurors? They will have a secret ballot vote, he won't vote, and if everybody votes "guilty" he will change his vote.What is the result of the second vote 12 Angry Men?
In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men we see a jury struggle to come up with a verdict in a capital murder trial. After the second vote, some of the jurors are unhappy that two jurors have now voted not guilty.Who was last juror to vote not guilty?
Juror #8 (Jack Lemmon): An architect who has two children. He is the only juror to originally vote not guilty.What does Juror 3 do to Juror 8 in the beginning of Act 3?
What does Juror #3 do to Juror #8 in the beginning of Act III that causes the others to cry "Look out!" How is this also an example of situational irony? Juror #3 charges at Juror #8 as if he were to stab him. He was "demonstrating" the correct way to stab with the switchblade. 
